Ethan Cook vs Jake Van Emburgh Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 09 Jul at 03:39 PM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
E. Cook vs J. Van Emburgh

AUS
1
Win
Played
0
Win

USA
1
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Cook 1 - 0 Emburgh
They have played 2 sets in total, with Ethan Cook winning 2 and Jake Van Emburgh winning 0. The last match between Ethan Cook and Jake Van Emburgh was at the M25 Dallas, 09-07-2025, Round: R1, Surface: I.hard, with Ethan Cook getting the victory 6-3 7-5.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Cook | 1 |
| Emburgh | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(R1) M25 Dallas(07-09-25)
E. Cook vs J. V. Emburgh H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 45.96% (74-87) | Career Total W/L | 49.18% (90-93) |
| 1 | Indoor | 0 |
| 1 | Total H2H Matches | 0 |
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
E. Cook vs J. V. Emburgh Match Preview:
- Emburgh shows a slight edge in second serve performance recently, winning 45.07% of points compared to Cook's 40.06%.
- Cook excels in return games, capturing 49.63% of points on opponents' second serves while Emburgh takes 40.94%.
- Regarding first serve returns, Emburgh marginally leads with 28.75% against Cook's 27.58%.
- Under pressure, Cook demonstrates resilience, saving 51.79% of breakpoints as opposed to Emburgh's 45.45%.
- Looking at overall match performance in the past year, Cook holds a winning percentage of 52%, while Emburgh stands at 42.11%.
- Both players favor hard courts, with Emburgh winning 53% and Cook 49% on this surface historically.
- In the Futures/Satellites/ITF $10K tournaments, Cook has a 52% win rate, surpassing Emburgh's 42.11%.
- Cook has faced tougher competition recently, with opponent average ranks at 189.72 compared to Emburgh’s 212.5.
- Cook has a significant advantage in deciding sets, winning 64% versus Emburgh's 11% over the past year.
- For break point conversion, Cook is more efficient, converting 36.92% compared to Emburgh's 30%.
Editorial Prediction (July 9, 2025, UTC):
Analyzing the statistics, Emburgh performs moderately better on their second serve. Meanwhile, Cook is more proficient in returning opponent serves. This aspect might balance the matchup, as Cook's return game could neutralize any advantage Emburgh gains from their better second serve.
In crunch moments, Cook appears steadier, saving a higher percentage of breakpoints and showing greater efficiency in breakpoint conversion. Their calmness under pressure, indicated by their edge in deciding set victories, suggests a psychological advantage that could prove crucial.
Emburgh may have slightly more success on hard courts historically, yet Cook's higher competitive win rate across the last year and tougher opponent standard positions them favorably.
Considering these factors, Cook stands as the likely winner for the upcoming match, capitalizing on their strength in returns and mental toughness in crucial game moments.
Ethan Cook vs Jake Van Emburgh Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
E. Cook vs J. V. Emburgh H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 13 | Games Won | 8 |
| 3 | Aces (Total) | 4 |
| 5 | Total Double Faults | 0 |
| 2:2:41 | Average Match Time | 2:2:41 |
| 59% (44/75) | 1st Serve % | 55% (37/67) |
| 80% (35/44) | 1st Serve Win % | 70% (26/37) |
| 48% (15/31) | 2nd Serve Win % | 43% (13/30) |
| 50% (3/6) | Break Pts Won % | 11% (1/9) |
| 42% (28/67) | Return Points Win % | 33% (25/75) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
E. Cook Recent Matches Played
J. V. Emburgh Recent Matches Played

E. Cook vs J. V. Emburgh Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 45.96% (74/87) | YTD Win/Loss | 49.18% (90/93) |
| 47.27% (173/193) | Sets Win/Loss | 48.89% (199/208) |
| 49.45% (1756/1795) | Games Win/Loss | 49.35% (1935/1986) |
| 48.53% (66/70) | Hard Win/Loss | 52.99% (62/55) |
| 33.33% (5/10) | Clay Win/Loss | 45.45% (15/18) |
| 50.00% (1/1) | Indoor Hard W/L | 39.39% (13/20) |
| 25.00% (2/6) | Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) |
| 0.17 | Aces Per Game | 0.19 |
| 300 | Aces Total | 354 |
| 0.14 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.13 |
| 235 | Total Double Faults | 258 |
| 1st Match | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 205.58 | Average Opponent Rank | 277.67 |
| 64% (3846/6022) | 1st Serve % | 58% (3767/6474) |
| 65% (2515/3846) | 1st Serve Win % | 65% (2457/3767) |
| 49% (1059/2176) | 2nd Serve Win % | 45% (1215/2707) |
| 41% (213/520) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 42% (206/489) |
| 37% (2202/5926) | Return Points Win % | 37% (2271/6216) |
| 0.00% (0/1) | Challenger W/L | 0.00% (0/1) |
| 46.25% (74/86) | Futures W/L | 49.45% (90/92) |
| 46% (74/161) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 49% (90/183) |
| 43% (17/40) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 51% (23/45) |
| 43% (19/44) | Deciding Set Win % | 54% (22/41) |
| 82% (79/65) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 89% (87/77) |
| 18% (79/14) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 11% (87/10) |
| 11% (82/9) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 14% (96/13) |